A tétel áttekintő adatai

Szerző
dc.contributor.author
Fehér, M. István 
Elérhetőség dátuma
dc.date.accessioned
2014-11-28T08:46:17Z
Rendelkezésre állás dátuma
dc.date.available
2014-11-28T08:46:17Z
Kiadás
dc.date.issued
2013
Issn
dc.identifier.issn
1224-7448
Egyéb
dc.identifier.other
ISSN 1224-7448 ISSN (online) 2247 – 8442
Uri
dc.identifier.uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10831/9579
Kivonat
dc.description.abstract
In Gadamer’s hermeneutics the relationship of philology to philosophy, viz., hermeneutics, often became a focus of his reflection. Thereby he underlined “the inner connection between the words ‘philology’ and ‘philosophy’”: philology is “the love of the logoi” and philosophy means “the love of the ‘sophos’.” Philology seems to precede hermeneutics, but the establishing of a text always involves necessarily interpretive work. It is a positivistic prejudice to believe that philology can do without interpretation, that is, hermeneutics. What Gadamer calls “conceptual history” [Begriffsgeschichte], and what he is pursuing as such, is precisely this inner interconnectedness of philology and philosophy, or philology and hermeneutics. This is in some sense Gadamer’s “method.” The first part of the paper argues that the interconnectedness of philology and philosophy, with each side referring to the other, is central to Gadamer‘s work; it is the “element” in which Gadamer‘s writings move. The second part investigates the relation of philology to history, concentrating on Gadamer’s thesis according to which philology is “Freude am Sinn, der sich aussagt”, while history is “Forschung nach Sinn, der verhüllt ist.” The third part centres around Gadamer’s characterization of the relation of philology to philosophy. Both share a love for the logoi, viz., wisdom expressing itself in words, and that constitutes their neighbourhood. But something such as “text” has a different meaning for philology or philosophy. It is the wording of a text that philology concentrates upon, whereas philosophy aims at “meaning.” Philosophy does not possess a language of its own, and that is why the effort of the philosophical concept does embody in ever newer linguistic forms. Philology tends to be true to (the wording of) the text, while philosophy is interested first and foremost in the sense or meaning of what is being said by the text. Philology is interested in the word, philosophy aims at understanding the matter. Philosophy is thus an unended conversation, where there is no first word any more than there is a last one. The lover of wisdom must be a lover of words, for there is no wisdom without words. Still, wisdom is not exhausted in words. Those who love words or speeches are not necessarily friends of wisdom. Wisdom is, for Plato, beyond the words. Love of words and love of wisdom, therefore, overlap, but do not totally coincide with one another.
Nyelv
dc.language
Angol
Kapcsolati adatok
dc.relation.ispartof
urn:issn:1224-7448
Cím
dc.title
‘Love of Words’ – ‘Love of Wisdom’: Philology and Philosophy from a Hermeneutical Perspective
Típus
dc.type
folyóiratcikk
Változtatás dátuma
dc.date.updated
2014-10-23T19:20:06Z
Nyelv
dc.language.rfc3066
eng
Terjedelem
dc.format.page
489-512
Mtmt azonosító
dc.identifier.mtmt
2483907
Füzetszám
dc.identifier.issue
Number 2, July – December 2013
Folyóirat
dc.identifier.jtitle
PHILOBIBLON
Kötetszám
dc.identifier.volume
vol. XVIII
Kiadás éve
dc.description.issuedate
2013


A tételhez tartozó fájlok

‘Love of Words’ – ‘Love of Wisdom’: Philology and Philosophy from a Hermeneutical Perspective
 

Ez a tétel a következő gyűjteményekben található meg

A tétel áttekintő adatai